Dopamine, appetitive reinforcement, and the neuropsychology of human learning: An individual differences approach
By Alan Pickering, Jeffrey A. Gray. 2001
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d521b62ae5253b0b5205bbcde1c96ccfafc8b986
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- What is reinforcement sensitivity? Neuroscience paradigms for approach‐avoidance process theories of personality (2008, methodology): “Approach processes concern sensitivity to rewarding stimuli, and are mediated by a Behavioural Approach System (BAS; Gray, 1987; Pickering & Gray, 2001), which is also known as a Behavioural Facilitation System (Depue, 2006), a Behavioural Activation System (Cloninger, 1987; Fowles, 1987; Gray,…”
- Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective (2006, methodology): “This has been most problematic for devising a trait measure of BAS-mediated Impulsivity ( Pickering & Gray, 2001; Smillie & Jackson, 2005), which has always been poorly defined in RST (Diaz & Pickering, 1993).”
- Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. (2004, unknown): “[27]), which rendered them more consistent with experimental data: however, in so doing, the very logic of discovering dimensions of personality was eroded, as was the force of Eysenck’s argument against a rotation of E and N to form dimensions of Anx and Imp: if Eysenck could refine his scales [24,”