Food Webs, Body Size, and Species Abundance in Ecological Community Description
By T. Jonsson, Joel E. Cohen, Stephen R. Carpenter. 2005
197 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d517c254006d419ace7267e2d179052ea7a71476
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- G. Woodward
- U. Brose
- W. G. Sprules
- L. Barth
- Neo D. Martinez
- Daniel B. Stouffer
- Jordi Bascompte
- Björn C. Rall
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Jordi Bascompte
- G. Woodward
- U. Brose
- J. Memmott
- Jennifer A. Dunne
- Daniel B. Stouffer
- Pedro Jordano
- S. Lavorel
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- G. Woodward
- Peter B. Reich
- S. Lavorel
- Jordi Bascompte
- U. Brose
- Jordi Sardans
- Josep Peñuelas
- I. Wright
Citations in the corpus
- Trophic level scales positively with body size in fishes (2011, unknown): “442 = 2.2624 and 102.2624 = 182.997; see Jonsson et al. 2005).”
- Connecting the green and brown worlds . allometric and stoichiometric predictability of above- and below-ground networks (2013, background): “…that allow coarse but statistically powerful descriptions of community patterns (Brose et al., 2006; Cohen et al., 2003; Hendriks and Mulder, 2008, 2012; Hudson et al., 2013; Jonsson et al., 2005; Mulder et al., 2005a; Reuman et al., 2009; White et al., 2007; Woodward et al., 2005).”
- Surfing the Biomass Size Spectrum: Some Remarks on History, Theory, and Application (2016, background): “There have been some attempts to utilize both species data and individual body size data in very comprehensive food web analyses (Jonsson et al. 2005), but whether the ecological insight justified the much greater sampling effort to incorporate species data remains an open question.”
- Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms. (2012, background): “maximum rate of exponential increase) (Brown et al. 2004; Jonsson et al. 2005), body size has strong potential to determine the relative impact of spatial vs.”
- Supporting Online Material for Evolutionary Conservation of Species' Roles in Food Webs (2012, background): “(56) Ythan Estuary 83 8 Hall & Raffaelli (57)”
- Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world (2012, background): “As a result, trophic height tends to increase with body mass (Jonsson et al., 2005; O’Gorman and Emmerson, 2010), although predator–prey body mass ratios may decline (Brose et al.”
- BODY SIZES OF CONSUMERS AND THEIR RESOURCES (2005, background): “…Stream, UK (Woodward et al. 2005) , (6) the Grand Cariçaie marsh at Lake Neuchâtel, Switzerland (Cattin Blandenier 2004) , (7) Tuesday Lake, USA (Jonsson et al. 2005) , (8) Alpine Lake communities in the Sierra Nevada range of California, USA (Harper-Smith et al., in press) , (9) Mill Stream,…”
- Ecological Networks in a Changing Climate (2010, background): “It is encouraging that this appears to the case for the small but increasing number of food webs that have been described in this way (e.g. Jonsson et al., 2005; Layer et al., 2010b; McLaughlin et al., 2010; Mulder and Elser, 2009; O’Gorman and Emmerson, 2010; Petchey et al., 2002; Woodward et al.,…”
- Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. (2007, background): “... relatively straightforward (Figure 2). Linking LSDRs to ISDs requires knowledge of the distribution of body sizes of species (the species size distribution; Figure 2). Because the total number of individuals in a size class,ni, is equal to the number of species in that size class (Si) multiplied”