Supporting Online Material for Evolutionary Conservation of Species' Roles in Food Webs

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations (2017, background): “Because species relatedness contributes to network cohesion, phylogenetically related species appear to have similar roles across different interaction networks (Stouffer et al. 2012, Poulin et al. 2013).”
Keystone species: toward an operational concept for marine biodiversity conservation (2015, background): “…Torres-Alruiz and Rodrı́guez 2013); loop analysis (e.g., Ortiz et al. 2013a, b); community viability analysis (e.g., Christianou and Ebenman 2005, Ebenman and Jonsson 2005, Berg et al. 2011, Stouffer et al. 2012); or food-web models (e.g., Okey et al. 2004, Libralato et al. 2006, Eddy et al. 2014).”
Nine quick tips for analyzing network data (2019, background): “ directions and weights by means of different statistical distributions [18]. Another current approach consists in performing a clustering on node characteristics: it includes motifs-based approaches [19] and a wide range of innovative node’s embedding techniques ( [20], Figure 2 c) including deep l”
The Structure of Ecological Networks Across Levels of Organization (2020, background): “…of interactions within and across species-based networks and food webs (Chamberlain et al. 2014, Eklöf et al. 2011, Gómez et al. 2010, Krasnov et al. 2012,Naisbit et al. 2012, Poulin et al. 2013, Rezende et al. 2007, Stouffer et al. 2012), suggesting macroevolutionary patterns of interaction.”