Ecological Networks in a Changing Climate

By G. Woodward, J. Benstead, Oliver S. Beveridge, J. Blanchard, Thomas Brey, Lee E. Brown, W. Cross, N. Friberg, T. Ings, U. Jacob and 12 more. 2010

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53103ef0cb1e89ead445f6ed9c72763ddc79df15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Freshwater food webs: towards a more fundamental understanding of biodiversity and community dynamics (2012, background): “…and this has been used to assess how increased pH is associated with larger but less dynamically stable food webs (Layer et al., 2010b) and how increased temperature is associated with species loss but lengthening of food chains in Icelandic streams (Friberg et al., 2009; Woodward et al., 2010c).”
The Temperature Dependence of the Carbon Cycle in Aquatic Ecosystems (2010, background): “…that are embedded within ecosystems, and which is often perceived as confounding in attempts to derive predictions at these higher levels of organisation (Montoya et al. , 2006; Perkins et al. , 2010; Ptacnik et al. , 2010; Purdy et al. , 2010; Reiss et al. , 2010a,b; Woodward et al. , 2010a,b).”
Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. (2012, background): “Food webs have already provided a conceptual framework for generating hypotheses on the effects of changing climate [58].”
Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world (2012, background): “This skewed structure affects several network metrics including nestedness, connectance and asymmetry (e.g. Blüthgen et al., 2008), although sampling artefacts need to be ruled out (Fischer and Lindenmayer, 2002; Lewinsohn et al., 2006; Vázquez, 2005; Vázquez et al., 2007; Woodward et al., 2010b).”
Variable flowering phenology and pollinator use in a community suggest future phenological mismatch (2014, background): “All species are embedded in communities and interact with other community members directly or indirectly, so that a change in phenology of one species has the potential to cause cascading changes that would not be revealed by examining smaller subsets of species (L azaro et al., 2008; Miller-Rushing”
Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time (2014, background): “…di ﬀ erentiated individual or pop-18 ulation niches is now well established (Bolnick et al. 2003, Devictor et al. 2010a) and has also reinforced the need to understand intra-speciﬁc trait variation to describe the structure and dynamics of communities (Woodward et al. 2010, Bolnick et al. 2011).”
The macroecology of phylogenetically structured hummingbird–plant networks (2015, background): “For this purpose, the use of network approaches for studying complex communities of interacting species, i.e. networks representing species as nodes and interactions as links between species, has significantly advanced our understanding of ecological systems (Woodward et al., 2010).”
Warming alters the size spectrum and shifts the distribution of biomass in freshwater ecosystems (2011, background): “…occurring at the species (and therefore the population) level (Walther et al., 2002), but scaling from populations to communities and ecosystems is challenging because of the perceived indeterminacy of ecological interactions (Yodzis & Innes, 1992; Montoya et al., 2006; Woodward et al., 2010).”