Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt
By N. Branscombe, Bertjan Doosje, Craig McGarty. 2002
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4bdadbce8ff529cba2e5b4aaf05f70538aed9ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Michael J. A. Wohl
- Anja Zimmermann
- Yechiel Klar
- G. Viki
- Kristin L. Schiffhauer
- Michael T. Schmitt
- M. Verkuyten
- N. Branscombe
Citations in the corpus
- Racial attitudes in response to thoughts of white privilege (2007, background): “Indeed, privileged groups are unlikely to experience threat when they consider their privilege, unless they see their relative advantage as potentially illegitimate (Branscombe et al., 2002).”
- Dehumanization and guilt as distinct but related predictors of support for reparation policies (2008, background): “together with the assertion that these actions have brought about the disadvantaged group's position (Branscombe et al., 2002; Leach et al., 2002; Zimmermann, 2007).”
- Collective Guilt as Distress over Illegitimate Intergroup Inequality (2006, background): “Therefore, collective guilt should primarily result when the ingroup’s relative advantage is perceived as illegitimate (Branscombe et al., 2002; Schmitt, Behner, Montada, Muller, & Muller-Fohrbrodt, 2000).”
- Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one's group has done wrong or been wronged (2006, background): “Given that self-focused distress is associated with collective guilt, collective guilt can be considered a threat to positive social identity because it can undermine perceptions that the ingroup is moral (Branscombe et al., 2002).”