Dehumanization and guilt as distinct but related predictors of support for reparation policies

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Power of a LabeL: MenTaL ILLness DIagnoses, ascrIbeD huManITy, anD socIaL rejecTIon (2011, methodology): “We measured ascribed humanity with measures employed in previous research (Hodson & Costello, 2007; Vicki et al., 2006; Zebel et al., 2008), but we relied exclusively on self-report.”
From infra-humanization to discrimination: The mediation of symbolic threat needs egalitarian norms (2009, background): “To the same extent that people may infra-humanize a group that they have previously attacked in order to prevent guilt (Zebel et al., 2008; see also Castano & Giner-Sorolla, 2006), they may attack the group because, supposedly, this group represents a threat that justifies the attack.”
What do I Care? Perceived Ingroup Responsibility and Dehumanization as Predictors of Empathy Felt for the Victim Group (2009, background): “The absence of a signifi cant relationship between perception of ingroup responsibility and victim dehumanization indeed suggest these two processes to be independent of each other (see Castano & Giner-Sorolla, 2006; Zebel et al., 2008).”