The Acoustical Biology of Elasmobranchs

By A. Myrberg. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2001

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4b39b0227ec09bfadd5f365ac67b54cbc10882e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. A. Popper
2. F. Ladich
3. Mardi C Hasting
4. D. W. Sims
5. A. Hawkins
6. T. Schulz-Mirbach
7. T. Lynch
8. E. Heagney

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Popper
2. D. W. Sims
3. Corey J. A. Bradshaw
4. M. Meekan
5. F. Ladich
6. Mardi C Hasting
7. T. Lynch
8. A. Hawkins

Citations in the corpus

• The role of learning in shark behaviour (2009, background): “These senses are important for location and orientation (Montgomery and Walker 2001) to a variety of clues, including inanimate electric fields (Kalmijn 1971; Kajiura and Holland 2002); low-frequency sounds (Nelson 1967; Myrberg 2001; Casper and Mann 2007), water movement (Maruska 2001; Peach 2001),”
• Effects of Sound on Fish (2005, background): “Studies of hearing capabilities (albeit very limited and very much in need of replication) suggest that the sharks and rays probably do not detect sounds at frequencies above 800 to 1000 Hz (e.g., Banner 1967; Nelson 1967; Myrberg 2001; Casper et al. 2003).”
• Diversity in Fish Auditory Systems: One of the Riddles of Sensory Biology (2016, background): “Several physiological studies in elasmobranchs suggest a main auditory role of the macula neglecta together with the macula sacculi (e.g., Corwin, 1981, 1989; Myrberg, 2001; Casper, 2011).”
• To go or not to go with the flow: Environmental influences on whale shark movement patterns (2010, background): “Sound and magnetic fields might also be important for navigation cues to whale sharks (Klimley, 1993; Lohmann and Lohmann, 1996; Montgomery and Walker, 2001; Myrberg, 2001).”
• Pelagic fish assemblages assessed using mid-water baited video: standardising fish counts using bait plume size (2007, background): “Sharks, including carcharhinds, can be attracted to low-frequency instrumental sounds, such as those emitted by a video camera, from a distance of up to 400 m (Myrberg 2001).”
• A sound approach to assessing the impact of underwater noise on marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “Many elasmobranch species clearly detect and respond to underwater sounds (Myrberg, 2001; Casper et al., 2012).”
• Parallel Evolution in Fish Hearing Organs (2004, background): “Sharks can also localize source direction, and oriented responses to intense sound were observed when sharks were 250 m from a sound source (Myrberg et al. 1972 ,2001 ). At the same time , it must be recognized that there is onl y the most limited behavioral data on shark hearing (Fay 1988; Myrberg”
• Sound, chemical, and light detection in sea turtles and pelagic fishes: sensory-based approaches to bycatch reduction in longline fisheries (2008, background): “Studies of acoustic attraction in ocean-dwelling shark species support the general conclusion that sharks, like pelagic teleosts, are low frequency specialists (Myrberg 2001).”