Pelagic fish assemblages assessed using mid-water baited video: standardising fish counts using bait plume size

By E. Heagney, T. Lynch, R. Babcock, I. Suthers. 2007

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/126929a702e4ac57cbbdc0d88698be01b5d84baa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

A comparison of two survey methods: differences between underwater visual census and baited remote underwater video (2010, unknown): “A BRUV unit would sample 314 m2 if the odour only dispersed 10 m from the bait in 30 min (Willis et al. 2000), which is most likely a significant underestimate (Willis et al. 2000, Harvey et al. 2007, Heagney et al. 2007).”
Calibration of pelagic stereo‐BRUVs and scientific longline surveys for sampling sharks (2014, background): “This deployment design allows pelagic stereo-BRUVs to estimate the composition, relative abundance and length distribution of fish assemblages that inhabit the water column (Heagney et al. 2007; Santana-Garcon, Newman&Harvey 2014).”
Coastal salmon farms attract large and persistent aggregations of wild fish: an ecosystem effect (2009, methodology): “The maximum abundance observed in either of the 2 revolutions was used, as is typical in baited remote underwater video (BRUV) studies (e.g. Heagney et al. 2007).”
Underwater video techniques for observing coastal marine biodiversity: A review of sixty years of publications (1952–2012) (2014, background): “The bait bag is placed close to the 166 camera, at a distance ranging between 0.5 m and 1.5 m (Ellis and DeMartini, 1995; Willis 167 10 and Babcock, 2000; Heagney et al., 2007).”
What is Big BRUVver up to? Methods and uses of baited underwater video (2017, methodology): “Bait plume dispersal has been highlighted as a major factor that could affect the fish assemblages observed via pelagic BRUVS in particular due to the sparse and heterogeneous nature of fish assemblages within this environment (Heagney et al. 2007).”
High connectivity of salmon farms revealed by aggregation, residence and repeated movements of wild fish among farms (2009, methodology): “The maximum abundance in either of the 2 revolutions was used, as is typical in baited remote underwater video (BRUV) studies (e.g. Heagney et al. 2007).”
Bait type affects fish assemblages and feeding guilds observed at baited remote underwater video stations (2013, methodology): “We sought to use similar amounts of each bait type, and, given the large size of the urchins, this restricted us to 200 g of each bait; this is more than some researchers have used at BRUVS (e.g. Heagney et al. 2007).”