Parallel Evolution in Fish Hearing Organs
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f22d351f6c785ccb9abd24d870b2a2a04befe73
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Why otoliths? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology (2005, background): “1) (e.g. Corwin 1981; Popper et al. 2003; Ladich and Popper 2004).”
- Bioacoustics of Fishes of the Family Sciaenidae (Croakers and Drums) (2006, unknown): “(eg, Popper et al. 2003 ; Ladich and Popper 2004 ).”
- Effects of Sound on Fish (2005, background): “…any of the fish species in Pacific Coast estuaries and bays that are potentially of concern with regard to human-generated sound (Table 2, page 17), although there are data for one or two species of lesser concern such as the American shad (Alosa sapidissima) (reviewed in Ladich and Popper 2004).”
- The effects of aquaculture production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion, and survival of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (2009, background): “Many teleost species, such as carp and catfish possess physiological adaptations called Weberian ossicles, a bony connection that bridges the swim bladder and the inner ear that enhances hearing capability (Popper and Fay, 1973; Popper et al., 2003; Ladich and Popper, 2004).”
- Effects of aquaculture production noise on hearing, growth, and disease resistance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (2007, background): “Rainbow trout do not possess specialized accessory hearing structures and generally have a limited hearing bandwidth and sensitivity (such species are often called hearing “generalists”) compared to species with hearing-specialized auditory peripheral structures (hearing “specialists”) such as carp ”