INTERDEPENDENT PREFERENCES AND RECIPROCITY
By Joel Sobel. 2005
946 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d49c311c7ef80c91a43aa4cfe39d4205290bf43c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- John A. List
- Nava Ashraf
- Marcel Fafchamps
- Conchita D'Ambrosio
- Andrew E. Clark
- Lutz Sager
- Serge-Christophe Kolm
- J. Stoelhorst
In Economics and Econometrics
- Joshua Blumenstock
- Nathan Eagle
- John A. List
- Nava Ashraf
- Marcel Fafchamps
- O. Bandiera
- Conchita D'Ambrosio
- Andrew E. Clark
In Safety Research
- Nava Ashraf
- John A. List
- Pierpaolo Battigalli
- Martin A. Dufwenberg
- Joshua Blumenstock
- Nathan Eagle
- O. Bandiera
- Marcel Fafchamps
Citations in the corpus
- Airtime transfers and mobile communications: Evidence in the aftermath of natural disasters (2016, background): “Schmidt (2006) and Sobel (2005) provide theoretical overviews.”
- Young, selfish, and male: Field evidence of social preferences (2004, background): “While several plausible stories readily emerge in an evolutionary framework, I will leave this modelling exercise for future research, but point the reader to related research in the field of social preferences; see Camerer (2002) and Sobel (2001) for recent reviews.”
- SIMULTANEOUS DECISION‐MAKING IN COMPETITIVE AND COOPERATIVE ENVIRONMENTS (2013, neutral): “The two common explanations for non-zero contributions to public goods are based on social preferences (Fehr and Schmidt, 1999; Sobel, 2005) and bounded rationality or mistakes (Andreoni, 1995; Anderson et al.”
- Dynamic psychological games (2009, background): “3See Rabin [67], Dufwenberg and Kirchsteiger [29], Falk and Fischbacher [31], Battigalli and Dufwenberg [8], Segal and Sobel [73]; see Sobel [75] for some related discussion.”
- Pride and Prejudice: The Human Side of Incentive Theory (2008, neutral): “mentioned below. In a recent survey that seems representative of the current mainstream view, Sobel (2005, page 432) concludes that the assumption of narrow selfishness should not be taken for granted: “A philosophical refusal to consider extended preferences leads to awkward explanations of some ”
- Individual Well-Being in a Dynamic Perspective (2012, neutral): “Sobel (2005) provides an interesting discussion on similarities and differences between the two strands of the literature.”
- Income inequality and carbon consumption: Evidence from Environmental Engel curves (2019, background): “There is no room for social or other-regarding preferences (Akerlof, 1997; Sobel, 2005).”
- A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the Tragedy of the Commons (2011, neutral): “DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.013”
- Stakeholder Relationships and Social Welfare: A Behavioral Theory of Contributions to Joint Value Creation (2016, background): “Although many social dispositions have been identified (for overviews see Bogaert, Boone, & Declerck, 2008; Fehr & Fischbacher, 2002; Sobel, 2005), researchers typically focus on the four that describe the vast majority of people.”