Challenges in Securing Vehicular Networks

By Bryan Parno, Adrian Perrig. 2005

568 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d49b53b33590a4aafe5f5779c41ae40f50af0d6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Efficient and robust pseudonymous authentication in VANET (2007, background): “A number of recent works are concerned with different aspects of security and privacy of vehicular networks, either outlining challenges [36], [28], describing particular attacks [21], [10] or more general attack overviews [5], offering general suggestions towards solutions [17], [30], proposing mec”
ECPP: Efficient Conditional Privacy Preservation Protocol for Secure Vehicular Communications (2008, background): “Extensive research efforts have been made by both industry and academia to investigate some key issues in vehicular networks [3]–[7], where security assurance and privacy preservation are two primary concerns [8]–[11].”
Securing vehicular ad hoc networks (2007, background): “Parno and Perrig [29] discuss the challenges, adversary types and some attacks encountered in vehicular networks; they also describe several security mechanisms that can be useful in securing these networks.”
Security and Cooperation in Wireless Networks (2007, background): “In particular, we would like to express our gratitude to Tansu Alpcan, David Basin, Jean Bolot, Daniel Figueiredo, Virgil Gligor, Matthias Grossglauser, Markus Jakobsson, Phil Janson, Frank Kargl, Edward Knightly, P. R. Kumar, Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Li Erran Li, Peter Marbach, James Massey, Cristina N”
An Efficient Pseudonymous Authentication Scheme With Strong Privacy Preservation for Vehicular Communications (2010, background): “The size of the certificate revocation list (CRL) and the checking cost are two important performance metrics for the revocation mechanism in VANETs.”
Survey on VANET security challenges and possible cryptographic solutions (2014, background): “to replay beacons frames [63], so the attacker can manipulate the location and the nodes routing tables.”
Eviction of Misbehaving and Faulty Nodes in Vehicular Networks (2007, background): “A number of research contributions analyze vulnerabilities [1], [2], outline architectural components, requirements, and design principles [3], and propose specific mechanisms [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].”
An Identity-Based Security System for User Privacy in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (2010, unknown): “Ç”
CreditCoin: A Privacy-Preserving Blockchain-Based Incentive Announcement Network for Communications of Smart Vehicles (2018, background): “With the increasing privacy concerns of data [4-7], there exist two major issues in building an effective vehicular announcement network.”
Pseudonym Schemes in Vehicular Networks: A Survey (2015, background): “could simulate congestion on a stretch of road to clear the path ahead [22].”
VANET security surveys (2014, background): “Powerful authentications provide legal evidence using external mechanisms, such as traditional law enforcement authorities to detect attacks [26].”
Future Intelligent and Secure Vehicular Network Toward 6G: Machine-Learning Approaches (2020, background): “The real-time requirement of the vehicular network desires low-delay transmission as well as fast attack prevention mechanisms [35].”
A survey of attacks and detection mechanisms on intelligent transportation systems: VANETs and IoV (2017, background): “Some researchers state that many safety-related applications should focus primarily on the prevention of attacks, rather than detection and recovery because of real-time demands [10].”