Efficient and robust pseudonymous authentication in VANET

By Giorgio Calandriello, Panos Papadimitratos, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, Antonio Lioy. International Workshop on VehiculAr Inter-NETworking, 2007

586 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d2d69006c0b2d40698658f26cbb0246fa8a8654

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

VANET security surveys (2014, background): “[88] propose vehicle On-Board Units with a set of pseudonyms (public keys certified by CA) and the corresponding private keys, without affecting the system security.”
A Survey of the Connected Vehicle Landscape—Architectures, Enabling Technologies, Applications, and Development Areas (2017, background): “These certiﬁcates and signatures may use pseudonyms to complicate deanonymization [53], [188], though computation presents a challenge [148].”
An Identity-Based Security System for User Privacy in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (2010, background): “Schemes leveraging pseudonyms in VANETs can also be found in [7], [18] with the revocation feasible in limited settings, and in [19] where the certificate authority maintains mapping from an identity to the set of vehicle-generated pseudonyms.”
TACKing Together Efficient Authentication, Revocation, and Privacy in VANETs (2009, background): “Such mechanisms would require future work or driver-defined policies to help balance usability (associate keys) and privacy (unlinkability with key changes).”
Pseudonym Schemes in Vehicular Networks: A Survey (2015, methodology): “[96] propose to use group signatures to enable vehicle OBUs to generate and certify”
VANet security challenges and solutions: A survey (2017, background): “Confidentiality NHTSA and ETSI via symmetric and asymmetric encryption.”
Pseudonym Changing at Social Spots: An Effective Strategy for Location Privacy in VANETs (2012, background): “Note that if the authorized anonymous key is protected by a password-based tamper-proof device, Calandriello et al.’s scheme [20] can fall into our key insulated pseudonym self-delegation model, but the cost will increase accordingly.”
Eviction of Misbehaving and Faulty Nodes in Vehicular Networks (2007, background): “Different aspects of revocation were discussed in [7], [32], [33] without a complete solution provided.”
A Lightweight Message Authentication Scheme for Smart Grid Communications (2011, methodology): “To compare with thi s, we considered ECDSA-256 authentication and encryption in our simulations since its security level is comparable to th at of 128-bits cryptography [30].”
Multi-Factor Authentication: A Survey (2018, background): “, the one whose identity is authenticated in advance, can gain the access rights [60,61].”
An Efficient Pseudonymous Authentication Scheme With Strong Privacy Preservation for Vehicular Communications (2010, background): “based schemes have an advantage that the CRL size is linear with the number of revoked vehicles, but the checking operation involves two pairing calculations, which could take about 10(4) times the computation cost than a string comparison [8].”