Making Watershed Partnerships Work: A Review of the Empirical Literature
485 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d49b39ded015097e9a46ea3be2773a3941d0565b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Global and Planetary Change
- Paul Sabatier
- W. Leach
- N. Pelkey
- Raphael Mathevet
- Tim Lynam
- Coralie Calvet
- Michel E. Etienne
- M. A. Moote
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement (2003, background): “To date, few such meta-analyses exist, although Leach and Pelkey (2001) and Kenney (2000) are beginnings.”
- Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington (2002, methodology): “…also used to measure whether each partnership has improved its participants’ stores of human and social capital—a criterion that many watershed participants and scholars argue is both good in itself and necessary for long-term policy implementation and conflict resolution (Leach and Pelkey, 2001).”
- To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking (2005, background): “Three variables capture aspects of the stakeholders’ breadth and success of past collaboration.”
- Water Management in the Camargue Biosphere Reserve: Insights from Comparative Mental Models Analysis (2011, background): “Our results show that the Water Board meetings have promoted greater knowledge and mutual understanding, which are important elements for successful collaboration (Innes 1999, Leach and Pelkey 2001).”