Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement

By A. Conley, M. A. Moote. 2003

563 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7143261a384e88cb1a28c7e84165975709dc74aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Ö. Bodin
2. R. Plummer
3. D. Armitage
4. J. Baird
5. J. Voss
6. P. Robbins
7. M. Stokes
8. Basil Bornemann

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Ö. Bodin
2. R. Plummer
3. D. Armitage
4. J. Voss
5. M. Stokes
6. Basil Bornemann
7. Daniel DeCaro

In Public Administration

1. M. Stokes
2. Ö. Bodin
3. Daniel DeCaro
4. D. Armitage
5. R. Plummer

Citations in the corpus

• Writing the New West: A Critical Review. (2009, background): “We conclude with some promising areas of research, all of which involve less adherence to a strictly regional focus.”
• The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management (2011, background): “…with realworld political contexts that influence their functioning and impair their effectiveness (Lee 1993, McLain and Lee 1996, Walters 1997, Conley and Moote 2003, Hahn et al. 2006, Armitage et al. 2007b, Kemp et al. 2007b, Plummer and FitzGibbon 2007, Walters 2007, Allan and Stankey 2009,…”
• Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social–Psychological Perspective (2013, methodology): “Key Words: autonomy-support; environmental management; institutional fit; procedural justice; psychology; public participation; self-determination; social acceptability; social–ecological systems; sustainable development”
• Is Adaptive Co-management Delivering? Examining Relationships Between Collaboration, Learning and Outcomes in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (2017, background): “…appraisals are needed to reconcile rhetoric with reality in regards to community-based management (Kellert et al., 2000), collaboration (Conley and Moote, 2003; Bryan, 2004; Frame et al., 2004), co-management (Nadasdy, 2003; Natcher et al., 2005), and participatory approaches more…”
• A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world (2007, background): “…to co-management: Kellert et al. (2000) note that little data exists on the social and ecological goals of community-based natural resource management while Conley and Moote (2003) observe that collaborative approaches to managing natural resources are garnering the attention of vocal critics.”