Electricity saving in households--A social cognitive approach

By John Th⊘gersen, A. Grønhøj. 2010

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d43338e15e1dedb814736926f55a1775dae86c5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Matthies
2. J. Steinhorst
3. R. Gifford
4. C. Klöckner
5. M. Csutora

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. R. Gifford
2. C. Klöckner
3. Andreas Nilsson
4. E. Matthies
5. Hong Chen
6. J. Steinhorst
7. Lucie K. Ozanne
8. D. Webb

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Hong Chen
2. E. Matthies
3. J. Steinhorst
4. R. Gifford
5. Andreas Nilsson
6. Ruyin Long
7. C. Klöckner
8. M. Csutora

Citations in the corpus

• One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem (2012, background): “There are only a few, published empirical papers that measure the significance of attitude– behaviour elements as compared to those of structural–contextual ones (Gatersleben et al. 2002; Thøgersen and Grønhøj 2010).”
• Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework (2013, background): “Sustainability research has sought to understand how beliefs about the effectiveness of near-term actions may affect future generations and therefore impact consumer behaviors (Cotte & Trudel, 2009; Thøgersen & Grønhøj, 2010).”
• Good Intents, but Low Impacts: Diverging Importance of Motivational and Socioeconomic Determinants Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior, Energy Use, and Carbon Footprint (2018, unknown): “…power than socioeconomic variables (Bruderer Enzler & Diekmann, 2015; Gatersleben et al., 2002; Hunecke, Hauenstein, Böhler, & Grischkat, 2010; Hunecke, Haustein, Grischkat, & Böhler, 2007; Kennedy et al.,2014, 2015; Keuschnigg & Schubert, 2013; Thøgersen & Grønhøj, 2010; Whitmarsh, 2009).”
• Energy saving behaviours: Development of a practice-based model (2013, background): “It also supports the contention that different strategies are likely to be required for households with different levels of income as well as housing type (Martinsson et al., 2011; Thøgersen and Grønhøj, 2010).”
• Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. (2014, background): “…2011), Pro-environmental consumer behaviour in Thailand (Rice, Wongtada, & Leelakulthanit, 1996), electricity conservation among Danish consumers (Thøgersen & Grønhøj, 2010), political activism for environmental causes in the U.S. (Lubell, 2002), as well as various other pro-environmental…”
• Saving electricity – For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing (2015, methodology): “The perception that oneself is able to contribute to solving these problems has been proven an important factor for predicting pro-environmental behaviour in several studies (Harland et al., 1999, 2007; Thøgersen & Grønhøj, 2010).”
• Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province (2013, background): “Personal norms that affect willingness to change behavior are influenced by values and problems awareness (Nordlund and Garvill, 2003; Thøgersen and Grønhøj, 2010).”