Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Method Research

By D. Prasad. 2012

807 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d412918a040606d99e31cb27bb8ef515be56abe2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences (2020, background): “It enables the researcher to combine it with questionnaires and interviews to collect objective information [Johnson & Turner, 2003].”
Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems (2013, unknown): “Mixed methods research can leverage the complementary strengths and nonoverlapping weaknesses of qualitative and quantitative methods, and offer greater insights on a phenomenon that each of these methods individually cannot offer (Johnson and Turner 2003).”
Research Design in Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods (2011, background): “Johnson and Turner (2003) have argued that the fundamental principle of mixed methods research is that multiple kinds of data should be collected with different strategies and methods in ways that reflect complementary strengths and non-overlapping weaknesses, allowing a mixed methods study to…”
Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings (2013, background): “The researchers had better “take extensive field notes during and after the observation sessions” (Johnson & Turner 2003: 313).”
Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration (2016, background): “In a mixed-methods study, one must recognize that those data-collection strategies have their limitations and their strengths (Johnson & Turner, 2003).”