Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates.

By E. Peeters, H. Nelis, T. Coenye. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2008

1,141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Graphene quantum dots-band-aids used for wound disinfection. (2014, methodology): “All the biofilm mass was quantified by crystal violet staining method.(54,55)”
Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions (2012, methodology): “straightforward and is commonly used for the quantification of biofilms formed by a broad range of microorganisms.(169) It cannot differentiate between live and dead bacterial cells.”
Combined application of antagonist Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and essential oils for the control of peach postharvest diseases (2010, methodology): “Biofilm formation and quantification were carried out according to Peeters et al. (2008).”
Critical review on biofilm methods (2017, methodology): “…and highly fluorescent resorufin can be monitored visually, by spectrophotometry or spectrofluorometry (for increased sensitivity); (ii) is less time-consuming (Peeters et al., 2008); (iii) resazurin is not toxic to eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells; and (iv) is inexpensive (O'Brien et al., 2000).”
Visible-light-driven enhanced antibacterial and biofilm elimination activity of graphitic carbon nitride by embedded Ag nanoparticles (2015, methodology): “0 mL) and measuring OD590nm of the homogenized suspension [24, 25].”