The cosmological evolution of quasar black hole masses

By R. McLure, J. Dunlop. 2003

488 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Virial black hole mass estimates are presented for 12 698 quasars in the redshift interval 0.1 ≤ z ≤ 2.1, based on modelling of spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) first data release. The black hole masses of the SDSS quasars are found to lie between ≃10 7 M ○. and an upper limit of ≃3 x 10 9 M ○. , entirely consistent with the largest black hole masses found to date in the local Universe. The estimated Eddington ratios of the broad-line quasars (full width at half-maximum ≥ 2000 km s -1 ) show a clear upper boundary at L bol /L Edd ≃ 1, suggesting that the Eddington luminosity is still a relevant physical limit to the accretion rate of luminous broad-line quasars at z ≤ 2. By combining the black hole mass distribution of the SDSS quasars with the two degree field (2dF) quasar luminosity function, the number density of active black holes at z ≃ 2 is estimated as a function of mass. In addition, we independently estimate the local black hole mass function for early-type galaxies using the M bh -σ and M bh -L bulge correlations. Based on the SDSS velocity dispersion function and the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) K-band luminosity function, both estimates are found to be consistent at the high-mass end (M bh ≥ 10 8 M ○. ). By comparing the estimated number density of active black holes at z ≃ 2 with the local mass density of dormant black holes, we set lower limits on the quasar lifetimes and find that the majority of black holes with mass ≥10 8.5 M ○. are in place by ≃2.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d35695c9d1bdec5796ddbf67a7c3002e29c79bed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. Volker Springel
  5. Thomas J. Cox
  6. D. Schneider
  7. R. Somerville
  8. R. Dav'e

In Instrumentation

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. Thomas J. Cox
  5. Volker Springel
  6. R. Somerville
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. D. Schneider

Citations in the corpus