A Unified, Merger-driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids

By P. Hopkins, L. Hernquist, Thomas J. Cox, T. Di Matteo, Brant Robertson, Volker Springel. 2005

1,519 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present an evolutionary model for starbursts, quasars, and spheroidal galaxies in which mergers between gas-rich galaxies drive nuclear inflows of gas, producing starbursts and feeding the buried growth of supermassive black holes (BHs) until feedback expels gas and renders a briefly visible optical quasar. The quasar lifetime and obscuring column density depend on both the instantaneous and peak quasar luminosity, and we determine this dependence using a large set of galaxy merger simulations varying galaxy properties, orbital geometry, and gas physics. We use these fits to deconvolve observed quasar luminosity functions and obtain the evolution of the formation rate of quasars with peak luminosity, (Lpeak, z). Quasars spend extended periods at luminosities well below peak, so (Lpeak) has a maximum corresponding to the "break" in the observed luminosity function. From (Lpeak) and our simulations, we obtain self-consistent hard and soft X-ray and optical luminosity functions and predict many observables at multiple redshifts, including column density distributions of optical and X-ray samples, the luminosity function of broad-line quasars in X-ray samples and broad-line fraction versus luminosity, active BH mass functions, the distribution of Eddington ratios, the mass function of relic BHs and total BH mass density, and the cosmic X-ray background. In every case, our predictions agree well with observed estimates, without invoking ad hoc assumptions about source properties or distributions. We provide a library of Monte Carlo realizations of our models for comparison with observations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67150be2d58b1cf1e073f89c0608c1dd0b84c54c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. R. Somerville
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. C. Conroy
  8. D. M. Alexander

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. C. Conroy
  5. Volker Springel
  6. R. Somerville
  7. Thomas J. Cox
  8. P. V. van Dokkum

Citations in the corpus