A JWST/NIRSpec First Census of Broad-line AGNs at z = 4–7: Detection of 10 Faint AGNs with M BH ∼ 106–108 M ⊙ and Their Host Galaxy Properties

By Y. Harikane, Yechi Zhang, K. Nakajima, M. Ouchi, Y. Isobe, Yoshiaki Ono, S. Hatano, Yi Xu, Hiroya Umeda. Astrophysical Journal, 2023

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the first statistical sample of faint type 1 AGNs at z > 4 identified by JWST/NIRSpec deep spectroscopy. Among the 185 galaxies at z spec = 3.8–8.9 confirmed with NIRSpec, our systematic search for broad-line emission reveals 10 type 1 AGNs at z = 4.015–6.936 whose broad component is only seen in the permitted Hα line and not in the forbidden [O iii]λ5007 line that is detected with greater significance than Hα. The broad Hα line widths of FWHM ≃ 1000–6000 km s−1 suggest that the AGNs have low-mass black holes with M BH ∼ 106–108 M ⊙, remarkably lower than those of low-luminosity quasars previously identified at z > 4 with ground-based telescopes. JWST and Hubble Space Telescope high-resolution images reveal that the majority of them show extended morphologies indicating significant contribution to the total lights from their host galaxies, except for three compact objects two of which show red spectral energy distributions, probably in a transition phase from faint AGNs to low luminosity quasars. Careful AGN-host decomposition analyses show that their host’s stellar masses are systematically lower than the local relation between the black hole mass and the stellar mass, implying a fast black hole growth consistent with predictions from theoretical simulations. A high fraction of the broad-line AGNs (∼5%), higher than z ∼ 0, indicates that the number density of such faint AGNs is higher than an extrapolation of the quasar luminosity function, implying a large population of AGNs in the early universe. Such faint AGNs contribute to cosmic reionization, while the total contribution is not large, up to ∼50% at z ∼ 6, because of their faint nature.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4e7e04b48ffdfedfb10a83c61d7a7df5030e19b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. R. Somerville
  2. R. Dav'e
  3. Christopher J. Conselice
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. A. Dekel
  6. A. Koekemoer
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. M. Franx

In Instrumentation

  1. R. Somerville
  2. R. Dav'e
  3. Christopher J. Conselice
  4. A. Dekel
  5. A. Koekemoer
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. C. Conroy
  8. H. Ferguson

Citations in the corpus