Testing the quantity–quality model of fertility: Estimation using unrestricted family size models
By Magne Mogstad, Matthew Wiswall. 2016
65 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We examine the relationship between child quantity and quality. Motivated by the theoretical ambiguity regarding the sign of the marginal effects of additional siblings on children's outcomes, our empirical model allows for an unrestricted relationship between family size and child outcomes. We find that the conclusion in Black, Devereux, and Salvanes (2005) of no family size effect does not hold after relaxing their linear specification in family size. We find nonzero effects of family size in ordinary least squares estimation with controls for confounding characteristics like birth order and in instrumental variables estimation instrumenting family size with twin births. Estimation using a unrestricted specification for the quality–quantity relationship yields substantial family size effects. This finding suggests that social policies that provide incentives for fertility should account for spillover effects on existing children.
Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcf4630dc34a3386e41177a83e3edfa21707a542
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Magne Mogstad
- Christian N. Brinch
- Matthew Wiswall
- M. Arellano
- S. Bonhomme
- Michael J. Kolesar
- T. Armstrong
In Gender Studies
- Magne Mogstad
- Matthew Wiswall
- Christian N. Brinch
- S. Bonhomme
- M. Arellano
- Michael J. Kolesar
- T. Armstrong
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond LATE with a Discrete Instrument (2017, background): “However, Mogstad and Wiswall (2016) reexamine the analysis by Black et al. (2005) and find a significant but nonlinear relationship between family size and child outcomes: While a second sibling increases the educational attainment of firstborn children, additional children have a negative…”