IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results

By L. Diamond. 2005

1,514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3096b668f27a74b29f1b577d57fa1d4f55dc375

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context (2011, background): “In particular, ICT-enabled governance is the interplay between ICTs and governance processes [74,75,103].”
Is strategy being implemented through projects? Contrary evidence from a leader in New Public Management (2012, background): “…management concerns and organisational structures to allocate accountability for individual projects without emphasising how to influence projects to succeed in delivering corporate strategy (Marnewick and Labuschagne, in press; Ruuska et al., 2011; Weill and Ross, 2004; Williams et al., 2010).”
An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and its Impact on Business/IT Alignment (2009, background): “Weill and Ross (2004) also refer to the start up of architecture committees: “At many enterprises, architecture committees get off to a rocky start, usually because the committees are formed to “impose” technology standards on the enterprise. . . .”
Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on (2015, background): “In recent years, researchers have indicated that IT governance might affect IT alignment if it can help to develop a system of accountability that surpasses a simple focus on IT planning (Weill and Ross, 2004; Wu et al. , forthcoming).”
Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination (2011, background): “In addition , the firm is able to anticipate and sense relevant changes due to advances in IT and the oppor - tunities created by emerging technologies ( Weill and Ross 2004 ) .”
Service-oriented technology and management: Perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade (2008, background): “…to formulate organizational governance in support of the service paradigm, similar to the call in the past several years for new governance approaches to the management of corporate information systems and infrastructures (Nolan and McFarlan, 2005; Nolan and McFarlan, 2005b; Weill and Ross, 2004).”
Designing data governance (2010, background): “Considering the synergy between macroeconomic and structural policies, corporate governance is a key element in not only improving economic efficiency and growth, but also enhancing corporate confidence.b A framework for linking corporate and IT governance (see Figure 1) has been proposed by We”
IT Assets, Organizational Capabilities, and Firm Performance: How Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation (2007, unknown): “Our measure of management competency (MC) therefore assesses both the degree of senior management commitment to IT projects and business unit involvement in IT decisions ( Weill and Ross 2004 ).”