Radiation belt electron flux dropouts: Local time, radial, and particle‐energy dependence
By T. Onsager, G. Rostoker, Hyangpyo Kim, G. Reeves, T. Obara, H. Singer, C. Smithtro. 2002
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2e63d0d7ab851955f7bf40d2b4e1384e04d707d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Geophysics
Citations in the corpus
- Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes (2015, result): “Such reductions at geostationary orbit, usually of shorter duration than this case, have been reported previously and have been studied extensively [Onsager et al., 2002, 2007; Green et al., 2004].”
- Testing loss mechanisms capable of rapidly depleting relativistic electron flux in the Earth's outer radiation belt (2004, background): “A12211 Onsager et al. [2002] study. To do so, we first smooth the electron flux data with a 2-hour running average.”
- Relativistic electron precipitation by EMIC waves from self‐consistent global simulations (2008, background): “to the atmosphere [e.g., Millan et al., 2002; Onsager et al., 2002; Green et al., 2004; Sandanger et al., 2007].”
- Timescales for radiation belt electron acceleration and loss due to resonant wave‐particle interactions: 2. Evaluation for VLF chorus, ELF hiss, and electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves (2007, background): “Rapid depletions of relativistic electron flux in the outer radiation belt reported by Onsager et al. [2002] , Green et al. [2004], and recently by Clilverd et al. [2006] could at least be partly due to intense scattering by EMIC waves.”
- Outward radial diffusion driven by losses at magnetopause (2006, background): “[7] Even though radial diffusion rates are strongest during the main phase of the storm and are capable of effectively transporting electrons to lower L shells and accelerating them, electron fluxes are commonly observed to decrease during the main phase of a storm [e.g., Nagai, 1988; Mathie and Man”
- Explaining sudden losses of outer radiation belt electrons during geomagnetic storms (2012, background): “During such an event the electron flux can drop by several orders of magnitude in just a few hour”
- Earth's Van Allen Radiation Belts: From Discovery to the Van Allen Probes Era (2019, background): “REPT = Relativistic Electron Proton Telescope; RBSP = Radiation Belt Storm Probes, LI AND HUDSON 8327 et al., 2013; Onsager et al., 2002; Shprits et al., 2006; Su et al., 2017; Turner et al., 2012; Turner, Angelopoulos, Li, et al., 2014; Turner, Angelopoulos, Morley, et al., 2014; Ukhorskiy et al.,…”
- Global characteristics of electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves: Occurrence rate and its storm dependence (2013, background): “The cyclotron resonance scattering is currently considered one of the leading loss mechanisms of radiation belt electrons [e.g., Onsager et al., 2002; Green et al., 2004; Bortnik et al., 2006; Onsager et al., 2007; Borovsky and Denton, 2009; Ebihara and Miyoshi, 2011; Turner et al., 2012], although…”
- Observation of two distinct, rapid loss mechanisms during the 20 November 2003 radiation belt dropout event (2006, background): “[7] Fast nonadiabatic losses are often observed during the main phase of storms [Nagai, 1988,Mathie and Mann, 2000; Desorgher et al., 2000; Onsager et al., 2002; Green et al., 2004].”
- Dynamic evolution of energetic outer zone electrons due to wave‐particle interactions during storms (2007, background): “Scattering by EMIC and hiss waves is a potential candidate to explain the observed sudden dropouts [ Onsager et al., 2002; Green et al., 2004] of relativistic electron flux at the onset of enhanced geomagnetic activity.”
- Acceleration and loss of relativistic electrons during geomagnetic storms (2003, result): “In contrast to the earlier study of Reeves [1998], we use a fixed definition of geomagnetic storms as distinct intervals during which the minimum value of the Dst index is less than 50 nT.”