Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants
347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2b916beedf7fc53bd45c7fc0f8b2abc70a0beac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- How Can External Relationships Enhance Innovation in SMEs? New Evidence for Europe* (2012, background): “An increasing number of studies (e.g., Chen, Chen, and Vanhaverbeke 2011; Freeman 1991; Love and Roper 2001; Nieto and Santamaria 2007; Rammer, Czarnitzki, and Spielkamp 2009; Rogers 2004; Zeng, Xie, and Tam 2010) show that firms must increase their number of interactions with other market base acto”
- Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data (2015, background): “…Cool 1989) Our empirical approach focuses on the innovation or knowledge production function which represents the process through which pre-existing knowledge stocks and current knowledge inputs are transformed into innovation outputs (Griliches 1995; Love and Roper 2001; Laursen and Salter 2006).”
- Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: a firm-level analysis (2008, background): “At the level of the individual business too, inter-company networks (e.g. Oerlemans et al., 1998) and intra-group knowledge transfers (e.g. Love and Roper, 2001) have been shown to have positive effects on innovation outputs.”
- Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence (2009, background): “…evidence shows that, on average, innovation output is significantly determined by innovation input (see, e.g., Crepon et al. 1998, Lööf and Heshmati 2001, Love and Roper 2001 or Janz et al. 2004), implying that input persistence should to a certain degree be converted into output persistence.”
- External Linkages, R&D and Innovation Performance in US Business Services (2007, methodology): “A dummy variable for independent/parent companies is used to allow for any possible effect of being a subsidiary or part of a larger group (Love and Roper, 1999, 2001).”
- Research and Development, Cash Flow, Agency and Governance: UK large companies (2012, background): “It can be used to illustrate how countries such as the UK differ radically from others such as Germany on issues such as intra-industry cooperation in innovation (Love and Roper 2001).”
- Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages (2014, background): “idea that openness to external knowledge sources helps to boost innovation performance, but that there are limits to the beneficial effects of external links (e.g., Ahuja, 2000; Katila and Ahuja, 2002; Laursen and Salter, 2006; Leiponen and Helfat, 2010; Love and Roper, 2001).”
- Firm Level Innovation and Productivity - is There a Common Story Across Countries? (2003, neutral): “The literature has also highlighted the potentially important role of networks for innovative activities and success (see e.g. Love and Roper, 2001).”
- Modelling the innovation value chain (2008, background): “Here, however, following Crépon et al. (1998), Lööf and Heshmati (2001 and 2002) and Love and Roper (2001), our focus is on the gains from innovation to the innovating firm itself.”