The construct validity of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being

By Dirk van Dierendonck. 2004

599 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d290ea58f26017b6bccf544a5890e4097edb8b98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Health

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emotional and psychological well-being in children: the development and validation of the Stirling Children’s Well-being Scale (2015, background): “…the understanding of what constitutes well-being has been a very long and lively debate, essentially focusing on two predominant views; the hedonic and the eudaimonic perspectives (van Dierendonck, 2004; Keyes, 2002; McDowell, 2009; Ryan & Deci, 2001; Springer & Hauser, 2006; Tennant et al., 2007).”
Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being (2006, methodology): “ Van Dierendonck (2004) examined the dimensionality of well-being with two Dutch samples, one of college students (N = 233) and the other of community members (N = 420).”
Some thoughts on spirituality and eudaimonic well-being (2006, background): “Although several problems exist with its factorial validity and internal consistency ( van Dierendonck, 2004 ), it has become a popular instrument.”
The role of personality characteristics and service failure severity in consumer forgiveness and service outcomes (2012, methodology): “Consumer religiosity (three items) and spirituality (six items) were measured using the Dierendonck (2004) scale.”
Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being (2008, methodology): “Five such studies (Cheng and Chan, 2005; Clarke et al., 2001; Ryff and Keyes, 1995; Springer and Hauser, in press; van Dierendonck, 2004), all using confirmatory factor analyses, have TABLE I Definitions of theory-guided dimensions of well-being Self-acceptance High scorer: Possesses a positive…”
Affect Recall Bias: Being Resilient by Distorting Reality (2020, methodology): “This scale has been shown to have good psychometric properties (van Dierendonck 2004).”
Relationships between mental toughness and psychological wellbeing in undergraduate students (2015, result): “While there is evidence of acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Ryff, 1989) this has not been the case in all studies (Van Dierendonck, 2004).”
Need Satisfaction and Well-Being (2013, methodology): “We administered a 39-item version of Ryff’s (1989) measure that has shown acceptable factorial validity and internal consistency reliability in Dutch, Spanish, Church et al. 515 and Columbian samples (Van Dierendonck, 2005; Van Dierendonck, Díaz, Rodríguez-Carvajal, Blanco, & Moreno-Jiménez, 2008).”
Reconsidering happiness: a eudaimonist's perspective (2008, methodology): “Factor analyses of the SPWB have indicated that a 6-factor structure to the instrument best fits the data (Ryff & Keyes, 1995 ), though not all studies have led to that conclusion (van Dierendonck, 2004 ).”
Self-Compassion and Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults (2016, methodology): “In order to reduce participant burden, the present study used the modification developed by van Dierendonck (2005).”
Investigating the Structural Validity of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales Across Two Samples (2009, methodology): “Van Dierendonck (2004) analysed the 84, 54, and 18 item scale versions and found support for a 6-factor model with a second-order PWB factor.”
Adaptación española de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff (2006, background): “Dos traductores bilingües tradujeron la totalidad de los ítems de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico (Ryff, 1989a) de la versión propuesta por van Dierendonck (2004).”
Ryff’s Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being, A Spanish Exploration (2008, methodology): “In the present article, the factorial validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological wellbeing is studied using the alternative shortened wellbeing measure suggested by Van Dierendonck (2004) , using a translation into the Spanish language.”