Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and the Locus of Repetition Priming of Picture Naming

By C. Barry, K. Hirsh, Robert A. Johnston, Catherine L. Williams. 2001

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d24ecd255696f9db2a510f1ab9ed78f65a5f7fce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. (2005, methodology): “Levelt criticized two AoA studies (Barry et al., 2001; Bonin et al., 2002) for not applying appropriate object recognition speed controls, but the majority of the studies reported earlier are subject to the same criticism.”
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, background): “Thus, it “remains an open question” (Knobel, Finkbeiner, & Caramazza, 2008 ) to what extent the lexical frequency effect is just an AoA effect, or whether both these factors in fact contribute to performance on word production tasks, especially picture naming (as some studies have found that compar”
The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations (2006, methodology): “…studies in the AoA literature have employed a type of factorial design where one set of stimuli varied on AoA while other variables were controlled and a second set of stimuli varied on frequency but were controlled on AoA (e.g., Barry et al., 2001; Morrison & Ellis, 1995; Turner et al., 1998).”
Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages (2002, background): “This effect of age acquisition on lexical is independent of differences in such things as the frequency of use of words adult language, and is observed in a variety of tasks including object picture naming (e.g., Barry, Morrison, & Ellis, 1997; Barry, Hirsh, Johnston, & Williams, 2001; Carroll & W”
A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies (2003, background): “, Barry et al., 1997; Bonin et al., 2002). The purpose of the following analyses was, thus, only to assess the generality of previous findings in picture naming, using the new set of pictures. As has generally been the case in previous multiple regression analyses in which naming latencies have been”
The effects of age of acquisition on an object classification task (2006, result): “These results are consistent with previous object naming studies (e.g., Barry et al., 1997, 2001; Morrison et al., 1997).”
More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. (2008, background): “Relatively subtle differences in frequency of language use between bilinguals and monolinguals introduced robust differences in ability to access the lexicon (that were in some respects more powerful than, correlated variables such as AoA; contra Barry et al., 2001).”
On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production (2006, unknown): “Observing an effect of age of acquisition in the immediate naming condition (Experiment 3) but not in the delayed naming conditions (Experiment 4) is in agreement with previous studies of this variable (Barry et al., 2001).”
Age of acquisition and lexical processing (2006, methodology): “…& Ellis, 1995, compared words acquired at about 4 years with those acquired at about 10 years of age), and studies of object naming have tended to use even smaller manipulations (e.g., Barry et al., 2001, compared pictures whose names were acquired at 3 /4 years and at about 6 /7 years of age).”