Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide

By T. Copeland. 2001

1,049 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2452d6247431f75ba009bdbeccfdeda836dac46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Investment, uncertainty and pre-emption (2010, unknown): “In the closing chapter of their book on real options, Copeland and Antikarov (2001) point out the drawback of deferring investment in research when a firm is in a competitive race to develop a new drug.”
Linking Customer Assets to Financial Performance (2002, background): “This task could be accomplished by measuring the variance of returns over time for various segments and calculating the appropriate discount rate (Copeland and Antikarov 2001).”
The use of real options approach in energy sector investments (2011, background): “Copeland and Antikarov [14] defined real option “as the right, but not the obligation, to take an action (e.g., deferring, expanding, contracting or abandoning) at a predetermined cost, called exercise price, for a predetermined period of time – the life of the option”.”
Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges (2018, methodology): “To value the expansion options, as suggested by Copeland and Antikarov (2003), we use the present value of the project without options as the underlying asset for the options.”
Investment in New Power Generation Under Uncertainty: Benefits of CHP vs. Condensing Plants in a Copula-Based Analysis (2012, methodology): “Rothwell, 2006; Wickart and Madlener, 2007; Fleten and Näsäkkälä, 2010) and provides a powerful tool to quantify investment risk (Copeland and Antikarov, 2001).”
Cost-of-Capital Estimation and Capital-Budgeting Practice in Australia (2008, background): “The developments in real options, for example, have reached the textbook level (Copeland and Antikarov, 2001), but relatively little is known about the impact of these developments on capital budgeting practice.”
Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice (2004, unknown): “Regardless of the approach used to value real options—and there are many—all are consistent with (Copeland and Antikarov 2001).”
Investment risks under uncertain climate change policy (2007, methodology): “Real option methodologies provide a powerful tool for quantifying investment risk (Copeland and Antikarov, 2001).”
Valuing Simple Multiple-Exercise Real Options in Infrastructure Projects (2007, background): “Over the years, other researchers have significantly contributed to expand real option theory Dixit and Pindyck 1994; Trigeorgis 1996; Amram and Kulatilaka 1999; Copeland and Antikarov 2001 .”