A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules

By Timothy J. Gilbride, Greg M. Allenby. 2004

487 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Learning Optimized Or's of And's (2015, background): “The consideration set may be precisely an Or’s of And’s classifier (Hauser et al., 2010; Gilbride and Allenby, 2004).”
Analysis of Implicit Choice Set Generation Using a Constrained Multinomial Logit Model (2010, background): “Functions (9) and (10) can be generalized to account for more than one constraint, allowing for several upper and lower bounds to be included simultaneo usly:”
A REVIEW OF METHODS FOR MEASURING WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY (2017, unknown): “A general discussion as well as advanced more flexible modeling approaches towards this direction are provided by Gilbride and Allenby (2004), Jedidi and Kohli (2004), Yee et al. (2005).”
The recognition heuristic: A decade of research (2011, background): “…multiat-tribute procedures that integrate all available information (Roberts & Lattin, 1991), studies suggest that products are ﬁltered into a consideration set by means of noncom-pensatory heuristics (Gilbride & Allenby, 2004; Laroche, Kim, & Matsui, 2003; Payne, 1976; Bettman & Park, 1980).”
Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models (2007, methodology): “The coding scheme is the same as that employed by Gilbride and Allenby (2004) , and results in a total of K=18 parameters.”
Attribute Processing, Heuristics, and Preference Construction in Choice Analysis (2009, background): “…and the reminders throughout the literature (see McFadden 1998, Yoon and Simonson 2008) about rule-driven behaviour (e.g., Swait and Ben-Akiva 1987, Gilbride and Allenby 2004, Martinez et al. 2009, Arana et al. 2008, Gabaix and Laibon 2000), we still see relatively little of the belief…”
Learning from Experience. (2014, unknown): “When the model includes utility shocks, the Gittins-Jones Index Theorem no longer applies because the states of non-chosen brands do not remain constant. With shocks, the consumer’s problem belongs to the class of restless-bandit problems as introduced by Whittle (1988). In general, such optimizatio”
Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science (2006, unknown): “, Goldenberg et al. 2001; Goldenberg et al. 1999a, b, c) propose that most new product concepts come from thinking “inside the box” with creative templates that transform existing solutions into new solutions. A template is a systematic means of changing an existing solution into a new solution. Tem”
Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement (2008, methodology): “Gilbride and Allenby (2004) and Jedidi and Kohli (2005) went beyond partworth estimation and utilized preference measurement techniques to study the formation of consideration sets.”
Choice set generation in spatial contexts: a review (2009, background): “In the context of consumer behavior, Gillbride and Allenby (2004) investigated consumers’ use of screening rules as part of a discrete-choice model.”