Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling
By Gabriele Gilardi, Inna Sharf. 2002
795 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2385d088b9662251f413777a6188e3fe1ac6e01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Pieter Abbeel
- Wojciech Zaremba
- E. Todorov
- Igor Mordatch
- Joshua Tobin
- Angel Flores-Abad
- Paulo Flores
- Ou Ma
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Hamid M. Lankarani
- Paulo Flores
- Qiang Tian
- Igor Mordatch
- Chelsea Finn
- E. Todorov
In Materials Chemistry
Citations in the corpus
- Physically consistent state estimation and system identification for contacts (2015, methodology): “With regards to contact modeling, Gilardi et al. provide an overview of the various approaches and attributes to consider when implementing contact models [13].”
- Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms (2007, methodology): “For an introduction to the literature, try the review articles by Gilardi and Sharf (Gilardi and Sharf, 2002) and Stewart (Stewart, 2000).”
- A review of continuous contact-force models in multibody dynamics (2018, background): “This has been primarily applied to impacts between rigid bodies [47].”
- A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing (2014, background): “A survey of general contact dynamics modeling techniques can be found in [94].”
- A new model for dry and lubricated cylindrical joints with clearance in spatial flexible multibody systems (2011, background): “Furthermore, it is important that the contact model add to the stable integration of the multibody system’s equation of motion [38–40].”
- Transfer from Simulation to Real World through Learning Deep Inverse Dynamics Model (2016, background): “This setup has merit in developing an experimental understanding of our approach, as we can control the degree of variation between source and target environments.”
- A comparative study of the viscoelastic constitutive models for frictionless contact interfaces in solids (2015, background): “One of the reasons for the success of classical impact theory is that it uses simple coefficients, namely the coefficient of restitution, to represent all the complex behavior that occurs at the contact-impact interface [73].”