Assembly theory applied to weed communities

By B. Booth, Clarence Swanton. Weed science, 2002

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d210909def4007bb1236741d8124df0672ea9393

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Weed seedbank community composition in a 35-yr-old tillage and rotation experiment (2006, background): “Agricultural weed seedbank communities generally con- 264 • Weed Science 54, March–April 2006 tain the propagules of multiple economically damaging species that may not act independently (Booth and Swanton 2002; Buhler et al. 2000).”
A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review (2012, background): “Weed size relative to that of the crop is a major parameter impacting final crop yield in crop– weed models (e.g. Kropff et al. 1992; Booth and Swanton 2002).”
Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland (2006, background): “The traditional successional paradigm did not hold very much potential for guiding management of range and wild lands, but alternative models have been proposed since then that hold more promise (Connell and Slatyer 1977, Pickett et al. 1987b, Tilman 1988, Davis et al. 2000, Booth and Swanton 2002).”
Stacked Crop Rotations Exploit Weed-Weed Competition for Sustainable Weed Management (2014, background): “Community ecology research is relatively common in the weed science literature, and assembly theory has recently been applied to characterize weed community responses to different management practices and environmental conditions (Booth and Swanton 2002; Ryan et al. 2010; Storkey et al. 2010).”
Timing of Cover-Crop Management Effects on Weed Suppression in No-Till Planted Soybean using a Roller-Crimper (2011, background): “Changes in weed suppression can influence the composition and abundance of the weed community (Booth and Swanton 2002; Facelli and Pickett 1991; Shea et al. 2004).”
Response and effect traits of arable weeds in agro‐ecosystems: a review of current knowledge (2017, background): “Under this community assembly framework, management practices and biological interactions can be considered as filters limiting or allowing the establishment, growth and persistence of distinct weed species that may disperse from a reference species pool to a specific site (Booth & Swanton, 2002).”
Reducing the Risks of Herbicide Resistance: Best Management Practices and Recommendations (2012, background): “However, species shifts are affected less by tillage than by herbicides because herbicides are a stronger constraint than tillage on the assembly of communities (Booth and Swanton 2002; Derksen et al. 1998).”
Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley (2005, background): “Furthermore, since plant traits instead of species are actually adapted to a particular environment, arranging weed species into functional groups may give a better understanding of how weed communities are assembled that just using species lists (Ghersa and León, 1999; Booth and Swanton, 2002).”
Dominant species identity regulates invasibility of old‐field plant communities (2006, background): “Knowing whether dominant species will have different effects as initial environmental ‘filters’ ( Booth and Swanton 2002 ) on invasion may help managers and practitioners select effective species to use in restoration efforts to reduce or limit further invasions by non-natives or promote establishme”
A functional analysis of large‐scale temporal shifts from 1970 to 2000 in weed assemblages of sunflower crops in France (2009, background): “The traits exhibited by a species determine its success or failure at each stage of the crop life cycle and associated cultivation practices (Booth & Swanton 2002).”