Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland

By R. Sheley, J. Mangold, Jennifer L. Anderson. 2006

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/061befa83b15068a2ba2cb499f07c5ab24a36908

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. V. Cramer
2. Richard J. Hobbs
3. M. Marler
4. J. Butler
5. D. Pearson
6. J. Runyon
7. T. Monaco
8. Y. Ortega

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. V. Cramer
2. M. Marler
3. Richard J. Hobbs
4. J. Butler
5. D. Pearson
6. J. Runyon
7. T. Monaco
8. Y. Ortega

In Plant Science

1. M. Marler
2. D. Pearson
3. Richard J. Hobbs
4. T. Monaco
5. Y. Ortega
6. Elizabeth E. Crone
7. V. Cramer

Citations in the corpus

• A role for assisted evolution in designing native plant materials for domesticated landscapes (2009, background): “Sheley et al. (2006) provided data to support the hypothesis that establishment and persistence of desirable native plants are enhanced when weed management protocols address factors that modify or repair processes that influence Pickett et al.’s (1987) three causes of succession.”
• Non‐target effects of broadleaf herbicide on a native perennial forb: a demographic framework for assessing and minimizing impacts (2009, background): “Journal compilation © 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 673–682 application for invasive plant control on native plant biomass and percentage cover (Marrs 1985; Tyser et al. 1998; Rice et al. 1997; Rice and Toney 1998; Sheley et al. 2006); these studies indicate that s”
• Restoration Ecology: Interventionist Approaches for Restoring and Maintaining Ecosystem Function in the Face of Rapid Environmental Change (2008, background): “Non-native plant species are prevalent in many ecosystems and often restoration interventions are focused almost entirely on weed removal and control (108, 109).”
• Secondary invasion: The bane of weed management (2016, background): “…of seeding on the response of secondary invaders, with two of these studies reporting successful mitigation of secondary invasion (Enloe et al., 2005; Sheley et al., 2006) and four studies reporting no effect (Endress et al., 2008; Pokorny et al., 2010; Stanley et al., 2011; Tyser et al., 1998).”