The Economics of School Choice

By Verna Gant. 2006

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

USING RANDOMIZATION IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS RESEARCH: A TOOLKIT (2008, background): “Proponents suggest that the added competition introduced by vouchers increases the pressure on public schools and that these schools improve their performance as a result (Hoxby, 2003).”
Choosing for quality or inequality: current perspectives on the implementation of school choice policy in Sweden (2010, background): “(Hoxby 2003a, 48) Some of the major theoretical and empirical contributions within the market-skeptical position have been made by Apple (1996, 2003, 2006), Ball (1994, 2003; Gewirtz, Ball, and Bowe 1995; Ball, Reay, and David 2002), Ladd (2002, 2003; Fiske and Ladd 2000, 2003), Reay (2004; Reay…”
The efficiency of Italian secondary schools and the potential role of competition: a data envelopment analysis using OECD-PISA2006 data (2013, unknown): “In the USA, there are numerous empirical articles on this issue; for instance, extensive research work by Hoxby (2000, 2003) aimed to demonstrate the positive effects of competition.”
School choice and segregation: evidence from an admission reform (2010, unknown): “This increase in efficiency benefits all students, also those not exercising choice themselves (e g Hoxby 2003).”