INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH

By Aija Leiponen, Constance E. Helfat. 2010

1,350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1d521fe121f71e9e6b247fe3d10dfdf372e6242

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Experience in R&D collaborations, innovative performance and the moderating effect of different dimensions of absorptive capacity (2020, background): “Foreign collaborations and innovative performance Extant literature shows that R&D collaborations with customers, suppliers and competitors improve a firm’s innovative performance (Nijssen et al 2012; Harhoff et al 2014; Mention, 2011; Leiponen, 2010; Belderbos et al, 2004).”
Open for Ideation: Individual-level Openness and Idea Generation in R&D (2012, methodology): “The responses to a similar survey question have been used to measure organizational-level openness (e.g., Laursen and Salter, 2006; Leiponen and Helfat, 2010) and to measure project and team-level search efforts (Gruber, MacMillan, and Thompson, 2013; Li, Maggitti, Smith, Tesluk, and Katila, 2012;…”
The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices (2009, background): “Larger firms hold a larger stock of resources, including knowledge on management practices and human capital and will therefore be more likely to introduce new practices (Hitt et al, 2001; Leiponen and Helfat, 2005).”
The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration (2014, methodology): “Following Laursen and Salter (2004, 2006), this measure has been used in numerous studies of open innovation to proxy for firm-level openness (see for example, Tether and Tajar, 2008; Grimpe and Sofka, 2009; Lee et al., 2010; Leiponen and Helfat, 2010; Garriga et al., 2013; Love et al., 2013).”
Ready to Be Open? Explaining the Firm-Level Barriers to Benefiting from Openness to External Knowledge (2017, positive): “Although some previous studies have shown that external technology sourcing increases innovative output (e.g. Ahuja, 2000; Gemser and Lenders, 2011; Leiponen and Helfat, 2009; Rosenkopf and Nerkar, 2001; Rothaermel and Hess, 2007; Van Wijk et al., 2008), more recently a number of authors have sugges”
The Role of Networks in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprise Innovation and Firm Performance (2012, background): “First, we investigate the impact of social capital embedded in network relationships on innovation breadth (Leiponen and Helfat 2010) and SME performance.”
External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms (2017, background): “Also, as radical innovation often results from knowledge recombination, having a greater number of complementary sources of knowledge could improve innovation success (Leiponen & Helfat, 2010).”
Externalities of openness in innovation (2013, methodology): “…however, studies looking at the potential benefits of the adoption of open innovation have, to date, focussed purely on the private benefits of openness (Love et al. 2011, Laursen and Salter 2006, Leiponen and Helfat 2010) and have not investigated the potential for externalities of openness.”