Why some things should not be for sale: the moral limits of markets

By A. Walsh. 2011

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Economics & Operations Research

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Nils Brunsson
2. Göran Ahrne
3. Patrik Aspers
4. Iason Gabriel
5. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
6. Geoffrey M. Hodgson
7. R. Muradian
8. Ulrich Witt

In Philosophy

1. Iason Gabriel
2. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
3. Geoffrey M. Hodgson
4. R. Muradian
5. Thorbjørn Knudsen

In Economics & Operations Research

1. Iason Gabriel
2. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
3. Geoffrey M. Hodgson
4. R. Muradian

Citations in the corpus

• Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment (2020, background): “Many things have value that is not captured by markets, or that is priced in ways that are obviously distorted (Satz, 2010; Sandel, 2012).”
• The Organization of Markets (2015, background): “Markets are culturally prominent today and, in many cases, ethically controversial (Satz, 2010).”
• In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “into environmental domains that have been traditionally governed by nonmarket norms (Harvey, 2005), some authors point to this question as a critically important missing debate (Gustafsson, 1998; Sandel, 2012; Satz, 2010).”
• What is capital? Economists and sociologists have changed its meaning: should it be changed back? (2014, background): “There many things – like love, trust and honour – that cannot be readily traded, and do not have a meaningful or appropriate price (Fox 1974, Walzer 1983, Ellerman 1992, Satz 2010, Sandel 2012).”