EVALUATION OF MODELS

By J. Albers, S. Haßfeld, C. Vahl. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering, 2002

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1a719218ed4e2c0bc9301dc02ec50805ea01553

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Citations in the corpus

A Content Analysis of Evaluation Findings Across 20 Gifted Programs: A Clarion Call for Enhanced Gifted Program Development (2006, background): “Yet, evaluation also needs to consider outcome-based impacts (Schalock, 2001) and adherence to defined program structures and standards of the field (Stufflebeam, 2001).”
The Metaevaluation Imperative (2001, methodology): “The metaevaluation of theoretical approaches was the present author’s assessment of alternative program evaluation models (Stufflebeam, 2001).”
Why do evaluation researchers in crime and justice choose non-experimental methods? (2005, background): “The most common arguments against the use of randomized experiments often involve practical or ethical concerns (for a review of some of these arguments, see Boruch 1976; Clarke and Cornish 1972; Cook 2003; Farrington 1983; Shepherd 2003; Stufflebeam 2001; Weisburd 2000).”
Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. (2014, methodology): “…in other fields such as organizational change, public health, and community programme evaluation (e.g. Dawson, 1994; Linnan & Steckler, 2002; Stufflebeam, 2001), here we present examples of frameworks that have been used in stress research, in order to illustrate how IPE can enhance our…”
Toward a definition of the ECB process: A conversation with the ECB literature (2002, methodology): “Quality program evaluation means the expert and professional practice of evaluation carried out following the Joint Committee’s standards and other relevant and appropriate guides, where program evaluation means accepted models and practices such as those reported by Stufﬂebeam (2001).”