Ribosomal Multi-Locus Sequence Typing: universal characterisation of bacteria from domain to strain

By Keith A. Jolley, C. Bliss, Julia S. Bennett, Holly B. Bratcher, Carina Brehony, F. Colles, H. Wimalarathna, Odile B. Harrison, S. Sheppard, Alison J. Cody and 1 more. Microbiology, 2012

596 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Summary No single characterisation scheme currently encompasses all levels of bacterial diversity, from domain to strain. We propose Ribosomal Multi Locus Sequence Typing (rMLST), an approach which indexes variation of the 53 genes encoding the bacterial ribosome protein subunits (rps genes), as a means of integrated microbial taxonomy and typing. As with MLST, rMLST employs curated reference sequences to identify gene variants efficiently and rapidly. The rps loci are ideal targets for a universal characterization scheme as they are: (i) present in all bacteria; (ii) distributed around the chromosome; and (iii) encode proteins which are under stabilising selection for functional conservation. Collectively, the rps loci exhibit variation that resolves bacteria in to groups at all taxonomic and most typing levels providing significantly more resolution than 16S small subunit rRNA gene phylogenies. A web-accessible expandable database, comprising whole genome data from more than 1900 bacterial isolates, including 28 draft genomes assembled de novo from the EBI sequence read archive, has been assembled. The rps gene variation catalogued in this database permits rapid and computationally non-intensive identification of the phylogenetic position of any bacterial sequence at the domain, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species and strain levels. The groupings generated with rMLST data are consistent with current nomenclature schemes and independent of the clustering algorithm used. This approach is applicable to the other domains of life, potentially providing a rational and universal approach to the classification of life that is based on one of its fundamental features, the translation mechanism.

Subfields: Food Science, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d183462984977317060f07fa75de6dafb08de433

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Food Science

  1. John H. E. Nash
  2. Aaron E. Darling

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ole Lund
  2. Frank Moller Aarestrup
  3. Frederick Albert Matsen IV
  4. Aaron E. Darling
  5. Guillaume Jospin
  6. Andreas Keller
  7. Christina Backes
  8. Valentina Galata

Citations in the corpus