Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis.

By Thomas Armstrong, B. Olatunji. Clinical Psychology Review, 2012

1,007 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1816199ba486ceb02093df34828bae8d77d160c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. J. Oakman
2. Amit Bernstein
3. Ariel Zvielli
4. Ernst H. W. Koster
5. Stephanie Waechter

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Oakman
2. Amit Bernstein
3. Caitlin A. Wright
4. Pam Qualter
5. Andrea L. Nelson
6. A. Hyatt
7. Ariel Zvielli
8. Ernst H. W. Koster

In Sensory Systems

1. Ernst H. W. Koster

Citations in the corpus

• Loneliness and attention to social threat in young adults: Findings from an eye tracker study (2014, background): “…patterns of attention processing to threat stimuli: (1) initial vigilance and maintenance relates to the orientation of attention to threat (Armstrong & Olatunji, 2012), (2) disengagement difficulties refers to attention being captured by the threat stimuli (see Buckner, Maner, & Schmidt,…”
• Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices (2014, methodology): “In the existing literature, eye movement studies use different indices to measure attention to threat (see Armstrong and Olatunji 2012 and Cisler et al. 2009).”
• Temporal Dynamics of Attentional Bias (2015, result): “Similarly, other recent work has also evaluated overt attention (i.e., eye movement data; Armstrong & Olatunji, 2012; Bradley, Mogg, & Millar, 2000).”