Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements (2019, background): “From 2014 onwards, there has been growing concern about the reliability of the task and several papers have directly examined its psychometric properties (Brown et al., 2014; Kappenman, Farrens, Luck, & Proudfit, 2014; Price et al., 2015; Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigurðardóttir, Björnsson, & Kristjánsson, 2”
Temporal Dynamics of Attentional Bias (2015, methodology): “Related to these data, traditional BS demonstrated very low levels of split-half reliability in Study 2 (see also Schmukle et al., 2005; Waechter et al., 2014); whereas TL-BS parameters demonstrated – for the first time in this literature – significant albeit modest levels of reliability.”
Attention Bias Modification Training Via Smartphone to Reduce Social Anxiety: A Randomized, Controlled Multi-Session Experiment (2014, background): “The finding of substantial dot-probe attention bias score reliability in later weeks demonstrates that smartphones are capable of delivering reliable reaction-time based assessments that are at least as good as those administered via PC (Ataya et al. 2012; Browning et al. 2011; Schmukle 2005; Stauga”