The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity

By Michael Christie, Eduardo S Brondízio, Robert Costanza, K. Jax, G. Kadekodi, P. May, J. Mcneely. 2010

1,044 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d170b59f2a83e3610d46840aec4599c1811656b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain) (2011, methodology): “For more details on economic valuation techniques, seePearce andMoran (1994), NRC (2004), or Pascual et al. (2010).”
Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach (2017, background): “The full detail of the valuation approach suggested here is explained in the guide on values [14].”
Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services (2011, neutral): “…increasing efforts to value ecosystem services in monetary terms, and to articulate such values through markets in order to create economic incentives for conservation (Balmford et al., 2002; Barbier et al., 2009; Daily and Ellison, 2002; Freeman, 2003; Heal et al., 2005; Pascual et al., 2010).”
Seaweed production: overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity (2017, background): “market’ public goods (Pascual et al., 2010; Tietenberg & Lewis, 2016) they tend to be over-consumed by society (e.”
A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management (2016, background): “…opportunity cost which is the preferred alternative when taking an economic decision, deriving from the idea that resources are scarce, which means to obtain more of one scarce resource, an individual or group collectively must give up some amount of another scarce good (De Groot et al., 2010a).”
Wild food in Europe: A synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service (2014, background): “This agrees with most classification systems for ecosystem services where wild food is a subcategory of provisioning services (De Groot et al., 2010b; MA, 2005; Maes et al., 2013).”
Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity (2015, background): “There are many different frameworks, classifications and definitions of ecosystem services in the valuation context (see, e.g., de Groot et al., 2010, 2002), and no consensus on a common framework has yet been reached (Nahlik et al., 2012).”