The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators
By P. Vinkler. 2010
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d16b168ab48810f1c10f1619b90471a7d8aa27eb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2019, background): “14Moed (2005) and Vinkler (2010) offer systematic reviews of bibliometric indicators for research evaluation.”
- Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019, methodology): “…developed and there has been extensive debate about appropriate methods for calculating citation indicators, normalization procedures, database coverage, and data quality (for an overview, see de Rijcke, Wouters, Rushforth, Franssen, & Hammarfelt, 2016; Moed, 2005; Vinkler, 2010; Waltman, 2016).”
- Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics (2014, methodology): “-mining mechanisms (Liu & Adie, 2013). 7. Normalization: Citations are normalized to allow cross-field and cross-time comparisons of the impact of papers (Bornmann, Leydesdorff, & Mutz, 2013; Vinkler, 2010). As higher altmetric scores can be expected from newer papers and papers on certain t”