Group Size and Incentive to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia

By Xiaoquan Zhang, Feng Zhu. 2007

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d110016f81cf782832114f7a55fcdb52a384ada1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Taxonomy of Knowledge Gaps for Wikimedia Projects (First Draft) (2020, background): “Zhang and Zhu [212] found that blocks to Chinese Wikipedia in Mainland China in October 2005, beyond preventing contributions from individuals located in Mainland China, also led to a 42.8% drop in contributions from non-blocked individuals.”
What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences (2014, background): “Zhang and Zhu [69] examined the social effect of content contributions in Chinese Wikipedia from the social influence perspective.”
Censorship of Online Encyclopedias: Implications for NLP Models (2021, background): “Freedom (自由) = {自由(freedom),言论自由(freedom of speech), 集会自由(freedom of assembly),新闻自由(freedom of the press), 结社自由(freedom of association),自由权(right to freedom),民主自由(democracy and freedom), 自由言论(free speech), 创作自由(creative freedom), 婚姻自主(marital autonomy), 自由民主(freedom and democracy), 自由市场(free mark”
Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2018, background): “eatment variables. The stable groups assumption is not applicable here, as none of the two sets of xed eects included in the regression correspond to an ordered variable. This is a sharp design. 9. Zhang and Zhu (2011), Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikiped”