A Taxonomy of Knowledge Gaps for Wikimedia Projects (First Draft)
By Miriam Redi, Martin Gerlach, Isaac Johnson, Jonathan T. Morgan, Leila Zia. 2020
15 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In January 2019, prompted by the Wikimedia Movement's 2030 strategic direction, the Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation identified the need to develop a knowledge gaps index -- a composite index to support the decision makers across the Wikimedia movement by providing: a framework to encourage structured and targeted brainstorming discussions; data on the state of the knowledge gaps across the Wikimedia projects that can inform decision making and assist with measuring the long term impact of large scale initiatives in the Movement. Since July 2019 and as the first step toward building the knowledge gap index, the Research team has developed the first complete draft of a taxonomy of knowledge gaps for the Wikimedia projects. We studied more than 200 references by scholars, researchers, practitioners, community members and affiliates -- exposing evidence of knowledge gaps in readership, contributorship, and content of Wikimedia projects. We elaborated the findings and compiled the taxonomy of knowledge gaps in this paper, where we describe, group and classify knowledge gaps into a structured framework. The taxonomy you will learn more about in the rest of this work will serve as a basis to operationalize and quantify knowledge equity, one of the two 2030 strategic directions, through the knowledge gaps index.
Subfields: Human-Computer Interaction, Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Patrick Lewis
- Gautier Izacard
- Fabio Petroni
- Akari Asai
- Sebastian Riedel
- Timo Schick
- Wen-tau Yih
- Aleksandra Piktus
Citations in the corpus
- The Web Is Your Oyster - Knowledge-Intensive NLP against a Very Large Web Corpus (2021, background): “First, it covers a lot of ground, but certainly not everything, and in practice many information needs cannot be fulfilled based on Wikipedia alone (Redi et al., 2021).”