Emotion and motivation II: sex differences in picture processing.

By Margaret M. Bradley, Maurizio Codispoti, Dean Sabatinelli, Peter J. Lang. Emotion, 2001

1,011 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0bbb9482d18295298f35287aeb0336cb20d05c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Trauma Type and Gender Effects on PTSD, General Distress, and Peritraumatic Dissociation (2013, background): “These findings highlight that men and women often perceive events differently (Frans et al, 2005 ), which may lead to differences in emotional reactivity (Bradley et al, 2001 ) based on the interaction of trauma type and gender.”
Gender differences in emotional response among European Americans and Hmong Americans (2007, background): “This is in contrast to studies in which men were more aroused than women or in which no gender differences in skin conductance levels were observed (Bradley et al., 2001; Kring & Gordon, 1998; Vrana & Rollock, 2002), suggesting that our findings may be specific to the relived emotions task.”
The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition, Emotion, and Physiology (2015, methodology): “Heart rate was recorded in beats per minute (BPM) and was conceptualized as an indicator of defensive responding to the iPhone ringing during cell phone separation (Bradley et al., 2001; Lazarus & Folkman,1984; Spielberger, 1979).”
Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis. (2006, background): “Self-reports indicate that women experience more sadness than men (Brody & Hall, 2000). Are there precursors to these effects in temperamental qualities in the early years? The Buss and Plomin (1975) dimension of emotionality and the Rothbart (1981) dimensions of sadness and negative affectivity sho”
The naked truth: Positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target perception (2007, background): “Although the small size of this group alone precludes firm conclusions about sex differences in ratings, these patterns notably mirror those described in previous reports, which additionally described similar patterns emerging from physiological indices of arousal (e.g., Bradley et al., 2001b).”
Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. (2001, background): “Tassinary et al. (1989), for example, reported that increased corrugator EMG was associated with a “nose wrinkle,” which is part of the disgust expression, and IAPS pictures of both contamination and mutilation reliably yield reports of disgust in studies of emotional evaluation (see Bradley, Lang,”
The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, background): “…activity is observed in instances that do not involve the experience of fear, such as when stimuli are experienced as subjectively arousing (e.g., Bradley et al. 2001; Weierich et al. 2010), intense (e.g., Bach et al. 2008), emotionally “impactful” (e.g., Ewbank et al. 2009), or valuable…”
Emotion regulation choice: a conceptual framework and supporting evidence. (2014, background): “Although the pictorial system includes a wide range of stimulus types and contents, its major purpose is to induce differing intensities of emotional reactions (e.g., Bradley, Codispoti, et al., 2001).”
On the relative effectiveness of affect regulation strategies: A meta-analysis (2009, background): “In addition, men show lesser reaction to affective stimuli and affective memories (Bradley, Codispoti, Sabatinelli, & Lang, 2001 ; Chentsova-Dutton & Tsai, 2007 ) and are more likely to use some (suppression; Gross & John, 2003 ) but not other (rumination; Thomsen, Melsen, Vijdik, Summerlund, & Z”