Visualizing Assumptions and Results in Network Meta-analysis: The Network Graphs Package

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020, result): “• Empirical examination of patterns of results between small and large studies, using comparison-adjusted [35,36], regression [37], or selection [38] models, do not indicate that results from small studies differ from those in published studies.”
Network Meta-analysis (2015, background): “Various parts of the network package require mvmeta version 3.1 or greater (White 2009, 2011, 2015), metareg (Harbord and Higgins 2008), and networkplot version 1.2 or greater (Chaimani et al. 2013; Chaimani and Salanti 2015).”
MetaInsight: An interactive web‐based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta‐analyses using R‐shiny and netmeta (2019, methodology): “Technical users may wish to make use of the full flexibility, modeling options, and output offered in the netmeta package 10 as well as other packages such as metafor 15 in R, network 16 and network_graphs 17 in Stata, SAS, JAGS, WinBUGS, OpenBUGS, and Stan.”