CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis

By Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Julian P. T. Higgins, Theodoros Papakonstantinou, A. Chaimani, C. Del Giovane, Matthias Egger, Georgia Salanti. PLoS Medicine, 2020

1,397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background The evaluation of the credibility of results from a meta-analysis has become an important part of the evidence synthesis process. We present a methodological framework to evaluate confidence in the results from network meta-analyses, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA), when multiple interventions are compared. Methodology CINeMA considers 6 domains: (i) within-study bias, (ii) reporting bias, (iii) indirectness, (iv) imprecision, (v) heterogeneity, and (vi) incoherence. Key to judgments about within-study bias and indirectness is the percentage contribution matrix, which shows how much information each study contributes to the results from network meta-analysis. The contribution matrix can easily be computed using a freely available web application. In evaluating imprecision, heterogeneity, and incoherence, we consider the impact of these components of variability in forming clinical decisions. Conclusions Via 3 examples, we show that CINeMA improves transparency and avoids the selective use of evidence when forming judgments, thus limiting subjectivity in the process. CINeMA is easy to apply even in large and complicated networks.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35bd793fad0fbf74d7f784a8052d834bc4e80f96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Michael Noetel

Citations in the corpus