Swedish teenagers’ difficulties and abilities to determine digital news credibility

By Thomas Nygren, Mona Guath. Nordicom Review, 2019

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract In this study we investigate the abilities to determine the credibility of digital news among 483 teenagers. Using an online survey with a performance test we assess to what extent teenagers are able to determine the credibility of different sources, evaluate credible and biased uses of evidence, and corroborate information. Many respondents fail to identify the credibility of false, biased and vetted news. Respondents who value the importance of credible news seem to hold a mindset helping them to determine credibility better than other respondents. In contrast, respondents self-reporting to be good at searching information online and who find information online trustworthy are not very good at civic online reasoning. Our findings, which may be linked to theories of disciplinary literacy, science curiosity and overconfidence, provide a basis for further research of how to better understand and support civic online reasoning in classrooms and society.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d06ad26a30ef867521a6694560d897ba95ed5e07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. S. van der Linden

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. J. Roozenbeek
  2. S. van der Linden

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. S. van der Linden
  2. J. Roozenbeek
  3. Thomas Nygren
  4. Stephan Lewandowsky
  5. Melisa Basol
  6. John Cook
  7. J. Reser
  8. Graham Bradley

Citations in the corpus