Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice.

By J. Whipple, M. Lambert, D. Vermeersch, D. Smart, S. L. Nielsen, E. Hawkins. 2003

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d023d1a033da69c02bd5cb7b9592969ebb29232d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. B. Duncan
2. M. Lambert
3. E. Usher

In Clinical Psychology

1. B. Duncan
2. M. Lambert
3. D. Smart
4. Kenichi Shimokawa
5. Wolfgang Lutz
6. R. J. Reese
7. E. Usher
8. Adam M. Grant

Citations in the corpus

• The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): The Heart and Soul of Change Project (2012, background): “E-mail: barrylduncan@ comcast.net Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne © 2012 Canadian Psychological Association 2012, Vol. 53, No. 2, 93–104 0708-5591/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0027762 93 Lambert, Harmon, Smart, & Bailey, 2008; Whipple et al., 2003).”
• The Reliability and Validity of the Outcome Rating Scale: A Replication Study of a Brief Clinical Measure (2004, background): “Two studies have further documented the scale’s ability to identify and improve the chances of success in cases at risk for a negative or null outcome (Lambert, Whipple, Smart, Vermeersch, Nielsen, Hawkins, 2001; Whipple, Lambert, Vermeersch, Smart, Nielsen, Hawkins, 2003 ).”
• Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. (2010, background): “Six major studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of providing feedback about patient progress (Harmon et al., 2007; Hawkins, Lambert, Vermeersch, Slade, & Tuttle, 2004; Slade, Lambert, Harmon, Smart, & Bailey, 2008; Lambert, Whipple, et al., 2001; Lambert, Whipple, Vermeersch, et al., 2”
• Waiting for supershrink: an empirical analysis of therapist effects (2003, background): “The results of experimental investigations into the effects of this feedback system have been reported on elsewhere (Lambert et al., 2001, 2002; Whipple et al., 2003).”
• Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist–client feedback and clinical support tools (2007, methodology): “In concert with previous studies investigating the feedback interventions (Hawkins et al., 2004; Lambert et al., 2001; Lambert, Whipple, Vermeersch, et al., 2002; Whipple et al., 2003), clients identified as not on track attended significantly more sessions than their on-track counterparts.”
• Using Formal Client Feedback to Improve Retention and Outcome: Making Ongoing, Real-time Assessment Feasible (2006, result): “As dramatic as these results may seem, they are, as noted in the Introduction section of this article, entirely consistent with findings from similar research (Lambert et al. 2003; Whipple et al. 2003).”
• Using client feedback in psychotherapy training: An analysis of its influence on supervision and counselor self-efficacy. (2009, methodology): “A number of research studies have indicated that continuous outcome assessment leads to fewer premature terminations and improved outcomes for clients who are at risk for terminating treatment early (e.g., Brown & Jones, 2005; Whipple et al., 2003).”