Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist–client feedback and clinical support tools

By S. Harmon, M. Lambert, David Smart, E. Hawkins, S. L. Nielsen, Karstin Slade, Wolfgang Lutz. 2007

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): The Heart and Soul of Change Project (2012, methodology): “Three studies (Harmon et al., 2007; Hawkins et al., 2004; Slade et al., 2008) found that using continuous assessment was helpful to all clients, although those who were predicted to not succeed in treatment benefited more.”
Moving Counseling Forward on LGB and Transgender Issues (2012, background): “Finally, rich data are beginning to emerge regarding the efficacy of routinely monitoring real-time client feedback about therapeutic progress (Harmon et al., 2007; Lambert, 2010).”
Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. (2010, methodology): “Because previous reports (Harmon et al., 2007; Slade et al., 2008) provided the results of efficacy analyses for only the CST Fb intervention, we compared this intervention with the NOT Fb intervention under equivalent inclusion criteria.”