Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices

502 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control (2020, background): “Even traditional organizations have been shown to use platforms such as these to source on-demand work directly from freelancers, creating the threat of immediate replacement for existing workers (Corporaal & Lehdonvirta, 2017; Howe, 2006; Schenk & Guittard, 2011).”
Managing the Crowd: Towards a Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Processes (2011, methodology): “According to Schenk and Guittard (2011), this approach allows a crowdsourcing organization “to choose an input from among a set of options that the crowd has provided.””
Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2018, unknown): “In addition, in current research, crowdsourcing is often mentioned explicitly as being an inbound open innovation practice where individual people are brought in to help solve a problem (e.g. Chanal and Caron-Fasan, 2010; Terwiesch and Xu, 2008).”
Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in China: a UTAUT-based model (2018, background): “They have begun to analyze how new commercial ventures and projects are successfully financed through crowd-funding (Bradford, 2012; Schenk & Guittard, 2011) and which factors drive supporter motivation to participate in a crowd-funding project.”