MARINE RESERVES EXPLOIT POPULATION STRUCTURE AND LIFE HISTORY IN POTENTIALLY IMPROVING FISHERIES YIELDS

By B. Gaylord, S. Gaines, D. Siegel, M. Carr. 2005

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf85e23ca5dfa06ff2ca21ef1538f708ae9a8de3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Gaines
2. Stephen R. Palumbi
3. S. Lester
4. R. Cowen
5. S. Sponaugle
6. Crow White
7. L. Botsford
8. M. Carr

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Stephen R. Palumbi
2. S. Gaines
3. S. Sponaugle
4. R. Cowen
5. S. Lester
6. L. Botsford
7. M. Carr
8. Crow White

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Sponaugle
2. R. Cowen
3. Stephen R. Palumbi
4. S. Gaines
5. M. Carr
6. C. Costello
7. Alana Domingo
8. J. Stake

Citations in the corpus

• Connectivity, sustainability, and yield: bridging the gap between conventional fisheries management and marine protected areas (2009, background): “…of larval settlement density, tends to favor reserves owing to a combination of (1) reserves serving as a source of potential settlers and (2) low levels of density dependent mortality experienced by settlers in fished areas (Gaylord et al. 2005; Ralston and O’Farrell 2008; White and Kendall 2007).”
• DNA barcoding as a tool for coral reef conservation (2007, background): “Recent trends in the science of marine reserve design have emphasized connectivity within reserve networks (Roberts 1997; Cowen et al. 2006) and the need to consider all life stages (St Mary et al. 2000; Gaylord et al. 2005), with particular emphases on dispersal stages (Gaines et al. 2003).”
• Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management (2010, background): “To benefit fisheries, the overwhelming majority of theoretical and empirical results indicate that reserve area should be divided into a network of closures whose size and spacingmaximize theneteffectof spilloverof fishable adults and export of larvae to fished areas between the reserves (1, 26, 43,”
• Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. (2009, background): “…has been recognized in the value and design of MPA networks (e.g., Crowder et al. 2000, Botsford et al. 2001, Lipcius et al. 2001, Sala et al. 2002, Russ 2002, Hastings & Botsford 2003, Gaines et al. 2003, Halpern & Warner 2003, Kritzer & Sale 2004, Gaylord et al. 2005, Fogarty & Botsford 2007).”
• Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning (2013, background): “For example, for species with considerable adult movement or 182 larval dispersal, small (or sparsely located) marine reserves may not protect stocks if fishing 183 pressure is sufficiently high outside [59, 60].”